You are viewing juliemc77

Previous Entry | Next Entry

All Those Pesky Collateral Folks

Amir Dekel over at I Dream of Genea(logy) posted an interesting research question about who to include in the ever-growing tree.  This is a question I myself had after I kept adding people that really had no "direct" relationship.  I started to respond to Amir's post via a comment, but it's a little hard to explain in such a short amount of space.  Plus, I believe in visuals, so I decided to do a post instead.

Now, when I say direct here, I don't mean direct-line.  I include every last cousin I can find.  What I don't include are their ancestors beyond the point where we became related.  Huh?  Basically, I don't bark up the "married into" family tree, unless I need to (for more information, research lead, etc.) or want to (interesting story, possible connection to other family, etc.).

So, for example, my second-great-granduncle, Edward P MULLIGAN married Sarah RALPH and had four children.  I will of course travel up Edward's line, since his father is my third-great-grandfather.  I will also travel down Edward's line to capture all those pesky cousins.  But, I will not do anything more for Sarah since she only married into my family.  I would only do this if I found that her family (or another spouse or other children) could prove useful in my research.

rq1

Sometimes this can lead to missed opportunities, as was almost the case with two of my first cousins twice removed.  Clarence L ROTTMAN and Ethel ROTTMAN were brother and sister, and each married a COSTER (Alma and George respectively).  Because I hadn't initially included the parents for George and Alma, I may have overlooked the fact that they shared the same parents and were indeed brother and sister.  Because I had copies of documents and my sources referenced, it was easy for me to go back and make the connection.

While I suppose siblings marrying another family's siblings is somewhat common (this is not the first instance in my tree and probably not the last), I'd rather miss them initially, than to have oodles of collateral branches out there just blowing in the wind.




Visit the GenBlog Store on Amazon!


Join the GenBlog network on Facebook!



Comments

( 2 comments — Leave a comment )
(Anonymous)
Oct. 16th, 2008 03:17 am (UTC)
TAG!
Julie I tagged you over at Orations! www.omchorations.blogspot.com!
(Anonymous)
Oct. 16th, 2008 11:30 am (UTC)
I know just what you mean, Julie. My philosophy is the same as yours. I don't research other people's families unless they are especially interesting to me. I draw the line at researching my blood lines only. It's not like that doesn't keep me busy enough! LOL!

In the case of two siblings marrying into one of my family lines... I probably would research back a generation or two just to determine if the families knew each other back in Poland but that's as far as I'd take it.

Nice article.
( 2 comments — Leave a comment )

Profile

juliemc77
juliemc77

About GenBlog

Preserving the past of the Cahill, Miller, McMahon, Rottman, Stoffel, Wach, & Webster families (and over 1,000 other twigs)!

I started this blog to share my genealogy research with others. Mini-bios of family members is my main focus. However, I also plan to share research challenges and successes, hint and tips I learn along the way, and participate in various carnivals and memes to add variety.

Enjoy!


Alltop. Seriously?! I got in?

Add to Technorati Favorites

Blog Flux Directory



Page Summary

View the Blogs I Follow @ My Blog Network @ Facebook

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Akiko Kurono